A NEW WAY INTO ARTArthaus / Academy / Marketplace ↗
← The Artist Genome Project
INSIDE THE PROJECT / RESEARCH & METHODS

Look beneath
the surface.

The ideas, data and engineering behind the Artist Genome Project. Follow the path from an artwork corpus and a cited passage to an experiment, a stored painting program and a film.

TECHNICAL NOTES · 25 OCTOBER 2026
Repository-based methods summaries · Research in progress
VISUAL EVIDENCE

Images → measurements → experiments

WikiArt-labeled cohorts, image identities, representation studies and controlled comparisons.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE

Sources → claims → scoped concepts

Retained passages, proposed ontology records, review and explicit work-level bindings.

The tracks meet through explicit evidence and compatibility checks. A dataset label, visual resemblance or extracted phrase does not automatically become an accepted artist trait or a painting control.

01
METHOD NOTE

The corpus behind the questions

How artwork images, metadata and art-historical text enter different parts of the research—and why the identity of every input matters.

Documented methods · incomplete full-corpus evaluation
02
METHOD NOTE

From a passage to a proposed concept

A technical view of source-grounded extraction, concept roles, review, work identity and the boundary between a description and an executable control.

Implemented extraction and integrity checks · semantic acceptance remains open
03
METHOD NOTE

Measuring an image without calling it style

CNNs, vision transformers, sparse features and Gram statistics help ask different questions. Their scores are evidence to interpret, not automatic artistic judgments.

Experimental · precise named controls did not qualify
04
METHOD NOTE

How a painting becomes a program

The path from a budgeted authoring plan to stored brush instructions, canonical painting state and a separately edited film.

Implemented research interface · work-scoped readiness
05
METHOD NOTE

What the evidence can—and cannot—say

Reproducibility, reconstruction, source support, visual review and artist-style validity each require a different test.

Evidence framework implemented · independent style validity unresolved
THE PUBLICATION PROGRAMME

From technical notes
to white papers.

Three proposed papers will bring the methods and evidence together. These are publication outlines, not released or peer-reviewed papers. Downloads will appear when a versioned manuscript and its supporting evidence are ready.

PAPER 01 / PLANNED

A source-grounded vocabulary for artistic practice

Corpus lineage, cited concept extraction, work identity and ontology-to-control boundaries.

Evidence needed for publication

Versioned corpus card; extraction protocol; semantic-review criteria; accepted and rejected examples; scope and coverage evaluation.

PAPER 02 / PLANNED

Executable digital paintings and reproducible replay

Native programs, staged authoring, deterministic state reconstruction and presentation adapters.

Evidence needed for publication

Program/schema matrix; pinned numerical environment; standalone replay receipts; decoded-pixel comparison; failure and compatibility cases.

PAPER 03 / PLANNED

Evaluating visual style representations and controls

WikiArt cohorts, sparse-feature statistics, baselines and held-out intervention findings—including negative results.

Evidence needed for publication

Admitted cohort manifests; overlap/duplicate audit; frozen calibration choices; comparator tables; uncertainty and qualification failures.